ArticleGlobal public health2026
Increasing competition in pharmaceutical tenders: Patents, treatment guidelines, and centralised procurement of Hepatitis C drugs in Brazil.
Article in Global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article investigates how therapeutic substitutability and patent exclusivity influence the centralised procurement of Hepatitis C drugs in Brazil. Combining data on treatment guidelines, registered products, and patent applications, this article analyses how the government can increase competition in tenders. Since 2019, the public procurement rationale has shifted from the cost-effectiveness of discrete products to simply buying the cheapest among treatment alternatives that are virtually equal in effectiveness, with originators of different patented drugs competing against each other. Moreover, rigorous examination of patent applications and robust opposition mechanisms led to limited patent exclusivity in some cases, allowing generic manufacturers to compete with the originators of their drugs and other drugs. The findings are discussed based on a matrix of competition scenarios and the literature on patent exclusivity, drug prices, and public procurement. The strategy of having both on- and off-patent competition in the same tender significantly increased the government's bargaining power and reduced drug prices. However, market concentration has limited this strategy. While helpful, local production and price control policies were less relevant than suggested. Therefore, this article provides lessons on how to combine different public policies to increase bargaining power and thereby promote access to high-quality treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.