Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42489180›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2026

Giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) gametophytes grow endophytically in red macroalgae: Implications for kelp restoration.

Tamzin Gannon, Wouter Visch, Christopher P Burridge, Adam Smolenski, Sharee McCammon, Ellen Gunn, Jeffrey T Wright, Catriona L Hurd, Scott Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tamzin GannonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Wouter VischInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-6239
Christopher P BurridgeSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Adam SmolenskiSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Sharee McCammonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Ellen GunnSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Jeffrey T WrightInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1085-4582
Catriona L HurdInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-4917
Scott BennettInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2969-7430

Funding

Australian Research Council DE200100900Cooperative Research Centres, Australian Government Department of Industry CRCXX000001Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and WaterHermon Slade FoundationIan Potter Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) forests have declined by 95% in Australia since the 1970s due to climate change. Despite expanding restoration efforts, long-term recovery is still lacking. Factors influencing recruitment by the microscopic gametophyte phase may represent a key mechanism underpinning the successful recovery and restoration of M. pyrifera. In the northern hemisphere, kelp gametophytes grow epiphytically and endophytically in red macroalgae and may represent an important "propagule bank" for kelp gametophyte recruitment. Our goal was to determine if M. pyrifera recruitment might depend on endo- or epiphytic gametophyte growth with understory red macroalgae on reefs in Tasmania, Australia. We first examined the composition and biomass of understory macroalgae living under kelp forests in Tasmania. We then tested if M. pyrifera gametophytes were located epiphytically or endophytically within specific red macroalgal hosts of 13 common species. Digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with M. pyrifera primers found M. pyrifera gametophytes in eight species of red macroalgae (Ballia callitricha, Gloiocladia halymenioides, Halopeltis australis, Phacelocarpus pepperocarpos, Plocamium angustum, Plocamium dilatatumi, Ptilonia australasica, and Ptilonia subulifera), with Ballia callitricha being the most common host (66.7% positive detections). By sterilizing the surface of host tissue, the detection of M. pyrifera DNA was consistent with endophytic occurrence of kelp gametophytes within the red macroalgal hosts but did not exclude the possibility that they also live epiphytically. These results suggest that red macroalgae may provide an important propagule bank for M. pyrifera gametophytes, and maintaining healthy understory assemblages may facilitate recovery and restoration efforts of M. pyrifera.

Indexed as

KelpMacrocystisSeaweedGerm Cells, PlantTasmaniaclimate changegametophytepropagule bankseaweedseedbankspores

Identifiers

PMID42489180
PMCPMC13659409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.