ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Y-linked editors for invasive rodent control.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive rodents are major contributors to biodiversity loss, particularly on islands where native species have evolved in their absence. Genetic biocontrol offers a promising suite of species-specific technologies that may contribute to rodent suppression and elimination. Here, we evaluate the potential of Y-linked genome editors (YLEs), which contain a nuclease that disrupts a female-essential fertility or viability gene, to suppress or eliminate a mouse population on a small, isolated island. We use the MouseGD simulation framework to model the inheritance patterns of YLEs and other genetic biocontrol tools in the context of rodent life history, calculating elimination probabilities, times to elimination and other outcomes for a range of construct and release parameters. Simulations suggest that YLEs are more efficient than other self-limiting tools, and are capable of achieving elimination within a short timeframe for modest release sizes. For an in silico mouse population size of 10,000, elimination is simulated within 5 years for releases of 350 males per month, and within 10 years for releases of 150 males per month. This scale of production is within existing capabilities, potentially enabling suppression to encompass a larger spatial scale. Simulations suggest that elimination could be achieved for YLEs targeting both haploinsufficient and haplosufficient target genes. Gene drives were simulated to achieve suppression and elimination for smaller release sizes; but also to spread to non-target populations. In contrast, YLEs display minimal spillover. These characteristics present YLEs as a promising, ecologically manageable biocontrol tool for elimination of invasive rodents and conservation of native species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.