Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488872›Full record

ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Antenatal Women in a Semi-Urban Hospital in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Chizoba Malachy Onyema, Assumpta Nnenna Nweke, Chinwe Wendy Oliobi, Chisom Chimezie-Chilaka, Chidiadi Nathan Ekpe, Nkiruka Bridget Uche-Nwidagu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chizoba Malachy OnyemaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State.
Assumpta Nnenna NwekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State.
Chinwe Wendy OliobiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State.
Chisom Chimezie-ChilakaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu State.
Chidiadi Nathan EkpeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State.
Nkiruka Bridget Uche-NwidaguDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Obstetric Fistula Centre, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer remains a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, especially among rural and semi-urban women in developing countries. Cervical cancer screening is a cost-effective method of detecting premalignant lesions of the cervix. The study aims to assess the practice and determinants of cervical cancer screening among women attending antenatal clinics in a semi-urban town of Ebonyi State. Methodology: The study was a cross-sectional study. Three hundred and ninety-six eligible participants were serially selected in the antenatal clinic. Data was analyzed using IBM-SPSS version 21.0. Percentages of the data were expressed. Chi-square was used to test for the level of significance, and P-values of < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Majority had heard about cervical cancer, 75.2% of them had heard about the screening, and 66.8% of them believed that cervical cancer is preventable. The majority of the women who heard about cervical cancer have never been screened. Knowing that cervical screening was important was the major motivator in 46.8% of the women, while not knowing where to go for the screening was the major barrier. There is a significant relationship between the number of children had by the respondents and the level of uptake of the cervical cancer screening (P<0.05). Conclusion: There was poor uptake of cervical cancer screening among the respondents despite commendable knowledge about cervical cancer and screening. Screening should be widely available in semi-urban areas and should be effectively incorporated into other existing health services.

Indexed as

barriersCervical cancermotivatorsscreeninguptake

Identifiers

PMID42488872
PMCPMC13391121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.