ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Engineering the future of advanced therapy medicinal products: a bioengineering call to action.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products - cell therapies, gene therapies, and tissue-engineered products - are beginning to deliver on the promise of curative medicine: CAR-T therapies double survival in chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas, gene therapies reverse the natural history of spinal muscular atrophy and hemoglobinopathies, and Pluripotent Stem Cell (PSC)-derived islet transplantation renders type 1 diabetic patients insulin-independent. Yet the trajectory from proof-of-concept to equitable, scalable deployment is consistently impeded not only by unresolved biology but also by engineering, manufacturing, logistical, regulatory, and economic bottlenecks that the bioengineering community has not engaged with at the required scale. In this Perspective, grounded in clinical experience across hematological malignancies, monogenic diseases, and metabolic disorders, we identify five rate-limiting bottlenecks where bioengineering intervention is urgently needed and uniquely tractable: scalable and adaptive biomanufacturing; real-time in-process quality control; precise targeted delivery; biomaterial and scaffold engineering for cellular engraftment and immune protection; and data-driven patient stratification constrained by health equity. We argue that the evolving regulatory landscape in Europe - including the European Biotech Act framework and ICH Quality by Design principles - creates structural incentives for engineering-led solutions, and that economic sustainability requires bioengineering to drive down production costs and enable the off-the-shelf transition. We call on the bioengineering community to engage with ATMP translation not as technical support to clinical medicine, but as a constitutive partner shaping its pace, cost, and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.