Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488807›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

An account on using bio-renewable solvents in organic synthesis: advances, prospects, and challenges.

Yaqoob A Teli, Sangita Kalita, S Aleena Chanu, Saikat Dutta, Chandi C Malakar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yaqoob A TeliDepartment of Chemistry National Institute of Technology Manipur Imphal-795004 India chdeepm@gmail.com cmalakar@nitmanipur.ac.in.
Sangita KalitaDepartment of Chemistry National Institute of Technology Manipur Imphal-795004 India chdeepm@gmail.com cmalakar@nitmanipur.ac.in.
S Aleena ChanuDepartment of Chemistry National Institute of Technology Manipur Imphal-795004 India chdeepm@gmail.com cmalakar@nitmanipur.ac.in.
Saikat DuttaDepartment of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology Karnataka (NITK) Surathkal Mangalore-575025 Karnataka India sdutta@nitk.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-348X
Chandi C MalakarDepartment of Chemistry National Institute of Technology Manipur Imphal-795004 India chdeepm@gmail.com cmalakar@nitmanipur.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of solvents during organic transformations is ubiquitous in synthetic organic chemistry and chemical manufacturing due to clear advantages. Biomass-derived, renewable, and innocuous organic solvents have garnered significant interest in recent years as economically feasible and environmentally sustainable alternatives to petroleum-derived solvents. This review provides an account of the recent advances in using various bio-renewable organic solvents during organic transformations and their functional efficacy compared to conventional solvents. Synthetic routes for producing the bio-renewable solvents from biomass-based feedstock have been deliberated. The bio-renewable solvents have been classified based on the functional groups in their molecular structure, and their physicochemical properties have been elaborated. Various classes of organic transformations, including acid- and base-catalysed reactions, metal-catalysed coupling reactions, and redox reactions, have been discussed with mechanistic insights. This literature review will assist the researchers in appreciating the major achievements, identifying the challenges, and expanding the scope of employing bio-renewable solvents in organic synthesis.

Identifiers

PMID42488807
PMCPMC13390121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.