ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2026
Rethinking Public Health Approaches to Crisis Response: Putting People First.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This commentary is written by the co-editors of the Collection entitled "Rethinking Public Health Approaches to Crisis Response: Putting People First". Specifically, in the call for submissions, we welcomed articles that detailed the actions, experiences, models, and mechanisms of involvement of community members and local knowledge in response to any clearly defined public health crisis, as a manifestation of how health systems are "putting people first". This commentary is a reflection on the seven papers eventually accepted for that Collection. The papers cover diverse settings, from South Korea and Saudi Arabia to sub-Saharan Africa and a variety of conflict settings. Collectively, these papers show a continuing gap in scholarship that convincingly progresses our thinking on approaches to achieve a people-centred public health crisis response. Nonetheless, the papers identify specific examples of local actions, including generating community trust for preventative actions and experiential learning in emergency care, showing how community involvement influences government legitimacy, intervention feasibility and societal recovery. Two papers present critical challenges for us: to build trust at the grass-roots level and to use health as a peacebuilding tool. These papers extend our understanding of the epidemic response beyond the conventional global health security paradigms and underscore the importance of shifting to a new paradigm that is people-centred and peace-led as the best way to protect future generations and their health. At a time of huge funding cuts to global health and development, and shifting political commitments to international solidarity, local citizen-led action to re-imagine health and well-being beyond security and national interest becomes simultaneously more challenging and crucial than ever before.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.