ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious threat to global health. However, current stewardship approaches rely on static antibiograms that overlook temporal changes in resistance. We developed Methods: As a proof of concept, Results: Analysis revealed 62.4% of the combinations demonstrate increasing baseline resistance. Among the 5920 country-level trajectories, 17.7% depicted spiralling-out patterns, compared with only 13.4% spiralling-in, suggesting a concerning global imbalance. The patterns differed across sample-microorganism-antibiotic combinations, highlighting heterogeneity in trajectories across settings. An open-access dashboard and analytical suite are provided to generate trajectory-based stewardship insights from routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing datasets (https://amrorbit.tavlab.iiitd.edu.in:3002/). Conclusions:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.