ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Case Report: Sigmoidorectal intussusception mimicking rectal prolapse-a diagnostic pitfall with surgical implications.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult intussusception is a rare condition typically associated with a structural lead point and often requiring surgical management, particularly in colonic forms where malignancy risk is high. Sigmoidorectal intussusception represents an exceptionally uncommon subtype that may clinically mimic rectal prolapse, posing a significant diagnostic challenge. We report the case of a 57-year-old female presenting with an irreducible anorectal mass, initially suggestive of prolapse, in whom computed tomography suggested the diagnosis of sigmoidorectal intussusception, which was subsequently confirmed intraoperatively. The patient underwent emergency surgical resection with primary anastomosis, and histopathology revealed a large tubulovillous adenoma with high-grade dysplasia as the lead point. The postoperative course was uneventful. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for intussusception in atypical prolapsing anorectal lesions and underscores the critical role of cross-sectional imaging in differentiating between rectal prolapse and invagination. Timely diagnosis enables appropriate oncologic surgical management and helps avoid potentially inappropriate perineal approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.