Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026

Spikes as perturbations of resonant neural circuits: an RLC framework with testable predictions.

Jeremy Sender, Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy SenderDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yi-Ping Phoebe ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational neuron models commonly reduce subthreshold membrane dynamics to a leaky RC integrator, confining computation to the spike and treating the inter-spike trajectory as passive decay. Yet impedance measurements and channel-specific analyses show that many excitable membranes have band-pass, inductance-like impedance profiles with a tuneable resonant peak - dynamics a first-order RC model cannot represent. This paper develops a spike-as-perturbation framework in which spikes act as impulse perturbations that launch regime-dependent transient trajectories in an equivalent parallel RLC membrane. We define the biological grounding and domain of validity of the reduction, show that post-perturbation RLC ringdowns carry circuit-identity and perturbation-timing state variables not available to a single matched first-order RC element without added delays, recurrence, or extra state variables, and demonstrate a concrete primitive - phase-based temporal discrimination - together with a spike-timing readout that makes it network-visible. A closed-form comparison (

Indexed as

Ihmembrane inductanceneural computationneuromorphic computingneuronal impedancephase-resonanceresonate-and-fireRLC circuit model

Identifiers

PMID42488762
PMCPMC13388887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.