Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488744›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2026

Volume not the defining metric: Dosimetric benefits of adding supplemental interstitial needles for small volume cervical tumors.

Emily Smith, Nicholas Ngo, Thomas Niedermayr, Elizabeth Kidd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nicholas NgoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Thomas NiedermayrDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Elizabeth KiddDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In brachytherapy for cervical cancer, previous data have demonstrated improved local control with adding supplementary interstitial needles for cervical tumors > 30 cm Material and methods: Fifty-seven intracavity/interstitial (IC/IS) patients treated from November 2019 through November 2023 with HR-CTV < 30 cm Results: The median HR-CTV was 19.3 cm Conclusions: These results suggest a significant dosimetric benefit of adding supplementary interstitial needles even for small volume cervical tumors, allowing enhanced dose shaping to improve HR-CTV coverage and achieving EMBRACE II target dosing goals, while maintaining normal tissue sparing.

Indexed as

brachytherapycervical cancerhybrid applicatorimage-guided radiotherapyinterstitial needles

Identifiers

PMID42488744
PMCPMC13389761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.