ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Optimising gynaecological surgical care for elite female athletes: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the rapid growth of women's elite sport, there is an increasing need to optimise healthcare for female athletes. These athletes can present unique clinical challenges, including high physical demands, altered energy availability, increased rates of pelvic floor dysfunction, and sport-related psychological pressures. Gynaecological surgery may significantly disrupt training and competition schedules, impacting both short- and long-term performance. Objectives: This narrative review provides a practical, evidence-based framework to support clinicians in delivering tailored peri-operative care for female athletes undergoing gynaecological surgery. Key findings: Drawing from current literature and multidisciplinary expertise, the review outlines key considerations across the pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases. It emphasises the importance of pre-operative assessment of menstrual health, bone density, nutritional status, and psychological readiness, particularly in athletes at risk of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). Intra-operatively, surgical techniques should account for anatomical variations in lean athletes, and measures should be taken to minimise complications such as neuropathy, wound breakdown and delayed recovery. Post-operative rehabilitation requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach integrating physiotherapy, nutrition, pain management, and psychological support to facilitate a safe and timely return to sport. Conclusions: This review highlights the need for athlete-specific surgical strategies that align with the physiological and performance demands of elite sport. Future studies are essential to inform sport-specific guidelines and optimise outcomes for this understudied population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.