ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
The mind's clock in sport: a narrative review of temporal processing across athletic disciplines.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time perception is a fundamental yet often underappreciated component of athletic performance. Athletes across various disciplines must continuously process temporal information to coordinate movements, anticipate events, and make effective decisions under pressure. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on temporal processing in sports without applying rigid methodological protocols, aiming to identify key patterns and sport-specific mechanisms. A literature search was conducted in PubMed and ScienceDirect for articles published between 2005 and 2025 using keywords related to time perception, sport types, and specific athletic disciplines. Thirty two studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. The reviewed paradigms included duration estimation, production, reproduction, discrimination, motor timing, representational momentum, temporal resolution and time-to-collision tasks. Two main findings emerge. First, distinct processing mechanisms for sub- and suprasecond intervals are consistently observed across paradigms and sport types: subsecond intervals tend to be overestimated/dilated, whereas suprasecond intervals are underestimated/shrunken. This pattern may reflect an adaptive strategy: temporal dilation of brief, critical events may preserve additional time for decision-making, although this mechanism appears limited to subsecond ranges. In contrast, compression of longer intervals may be more advantageous in extended play. Second, athletic experience modulates these effects. Engagement in sport is associated with enhanced suprasecond underestimation and subsecond dilation, particularly in high-stakes contexts where athletes frequently report subjective time slowing. These changes are sport-specific and often correlate with years of training. Physical exertion, fatigue, and emotional arousal systematically modulate temporal judgments, while accumulated expertise-rather than innate ability-appears to refine temporal processing through practice. These findings highlight time perception as a trainable, context-sensitive component of athletic expertise. Understanding how athletes perceive and utilize temporal information has implications for talent identification, training design, and performance optimization across sport disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.