ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Refining humane endpoint detection by time-series forecasting and threshold definition using a multivariate severity score.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severity assessment in animal-based research is not only mandatory but also requires the identification of robust, objective, and model-specific parameters. The RELative Severity Assessment (RELSA) procedure enabled multivariate severity assessment, allowing interpretation of outcomes in the context of a predefined severity grading. This study expands the application of the RELSA score by combining it with an Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA)-based prediction model, which we call foRcast. To facilitate interpretation of severity, a kernel density estimate (KDE) was applied to define exploratory thresholds on the RELSA scale. Data of mice reaching humane endpoints across models representing a broad range of severity profiles were reanalyzed using transmitter-derived parameters (e.g., heart rate) and behavioral parameters (e.g., voluntary wheel running), depending on the model. The primary focus was predicting RELSA scores at the humane endpoint using foRcast. With an overall root mean square error of 0.069 and 96% of actual RELSA scores falling within the 95% prediction interval of the forecasts, this tool showed promising preliminary performance. KDE was performed on sepsis data, yielding candidate thresholds at RELSA = 0.337 and RELSA = 0.647, which could be used to define severity zones for classifying the animals' burden, although these should not be confused with regulatory severity gradings. This proof-of-concept study showed the potential of the foRcast tool to accurately predict RELSA scores across various animal models and interventions, demonstrating the possibility to identify individual animals at risk of reaching the humane endpoint. The data also emphasize the intrinsic limitation of ARIMA models: drastic changes in the course cannot be reliably predicted. This underscores the need for higher-resolution measurements to detect early changes in animal well-being. Overall, the definition of candidate severity thresholds on the RELSA scale and the foRcast model represent valuable additions to the range of severity tools for refining severity assessment in animal-based research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.