ArticlePNAS nexus2026
Machine learning as an interpretive consistency approach for coupling geochemical and geophysical domains in data-limited landfills.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding landfill-related groundwater contamination is challenging in heterogeneous hydrogeological settings characterized by sparse monitoring networks and limited subsurface information, constraints common to many environmental and earth-science systems. Based on our previous investigations, we present an interpretive framework that synthesizes machine learning (ML), hydrogeochemistry, and subsurface geoelectrical imaging to characterize leachate plume dynamics and surface methane emissions. We examine two Canadian case studies: a closed, nonengineered municipal landfill and an industrial bark dump near an Indigenous community. At both sites, direct-current electrical resistivity (ER) and induced polarization (IP) surveys were conducted, and the resulting data were inverted to produce 2D and pseudo-3D tomographic images of leachate-related anomalies. In the municipal landfill, a supervised Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System employed geoelectrical proxies of waste stabilization to infer landfill-scale methane-emission trends, with localized misfits attributed to near-surface biogas attenuation and metallic-waste-related high-IP responses. Gaussian Mixture Modeling (GMM) and stacked pollution index mapping of hydrogeochemical data delineated contamination zones used to validate low-ER anomalies at well-screening depth. For the industrial landfill, hydrogeochemical facies were identified from water-quality parameters using unsupervised ML methods (GMM, Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering, and Self-Organizing Maps + K-means), supporting the interpretation of ER and IP anomalies associated with plume migration, mixing interfaces, and matrix-controlled attenuation. These studies illustrate a methodological framework in which ML links geophysical proxies and environmental processes. By integrating geophysical and hydrogeochemical information and evaluating cross-domain consistency using multiple ML methods, this framework reduces interpretive ambiguity and strengthens process-based conceptual models in data-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.