Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488592›Full record

ReviewShoulder & elbow2026

Long-term survival outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty: An implant-level systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and registry data with more than 13 years follow-up.

Faheem Bhatti, Saima Waseem, Hemant Singh, Robert Scott, Jenna Shepherd, Pip Divall, Niel Kang, Harvinder Pal Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Faheem BhattiTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3897-4196
Saima WaseemTrauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-7808
Hemant SinghTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5969-5089
Robert ScottNEC Software Solutions, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
Jenna ShepherdTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-2213
Pip DivallEducation Centre Library, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-3224
Niel KangTrauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3820-7627
Harvinder Pal SinghTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-2802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: It is known that survival of primary total shoulder arthroplasty at 10 years is excellent; however, evidence beyond this time-point is limited. We aimed to evaluate the long-term survival of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) implants, at ≥13 years follow-up, using case series and international joint registry data. Methods: CENTRAL, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched for studies reporting TSA survival data at ≥13 years follow-up. National joint registries were contacted for implant data. Pooled survival at 13, 15, and 20 years was calculated for case series and registry data using a random-effects model. Results: Data from four national joint registries and seven studies were analysed. Pooled aTSA registry data showed survival of 91.50% (89.36-93.64) at 13-years and 90.82% (88.25-93.38) at 15-years. Pooled rTSA registry data showed survival of 93.19% (91.78-94.60) at 13-years and 90.74% (85.73-95.74) at 15-years. Data from case series gave pooled aTSA survival estimates of 88.69% (76.97-100.42), 90.23% (85.87-94.58) and 82.08% (70.30-93.88) at 13, 15 and 20 years, respectively. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests approximately 90% of shoulder replacements last up to 15 years without revision. Variation between individual implants highlights the need for granular implant-level data to guide patient and clinician decision making.

Indexed as

arthroplastyjoint replacementlong-termregistryShouldersurvival

Identifiers

PMID42488592
PMCPMC13388502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.