ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Physiology-guided beat-level arrhythmia classification from ECG using a CNN-transformer hybrid neural network.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate ECG-based arrhythmia classification is essential for large-scale screening and continuous monitoring, but recognition remains challenging because diagnostic cues are distributed across local waveform morphology and temporal rhythm context. Methods: We developed TransECG-Net, a physiology-guided CNN-Transformer hybrid network for AAMI-aligned five-class heartbeat classification. The CNN branch extracts local P-QRS-T morphology, QRS-width variation, and amplitude-shape features, while the Transformer branch models global temporal dependencies using positional encoding and multi-head self-attention. Both representations are combined through a learnable dimension-wise gated fusion module. Public ECG recordings were segmented into fixed-length heartbeat windows and split into training, validation, and testing subsets using a stratified 70%/15%/15% protocol. Performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score, with additional noise-robustness and edge-device evaluation. Results: TransECG-Net correctly classified 4,976 of 5,000 testing samples, achieving 99.52% accuracy. Class-wise F1-scores were 99.90% for N, 99.43% for L, 99.56% for R, 99.61% for A, and 99.12% for V, with a macro-averaged F1-score of 99.52%. It outperformed DeepECG-Net (98.30%) and Hybrid CNN-BLSTM (94.20%) while maintaining 35 ms latency and 28 MB memory footprint. Conclusion: TransECG-Net supports accurate, physiology-guided, noise-tolerant, and edge-deployable ECG arrhythmia screening for wearable and clinical monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.