ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Contemporary extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation programs for cardiac arrest.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of global mortality, with low survival rates despite advances in resuscitation science. Reported survival ranges from 8% to 34% for out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has emerged as a rescue therapy for patients unresponsive to conventional CPR, leveraging veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to provide artificial circulation, gas exchange, and maintenance of organ perfusion in the absence of spontaneous native circulation. Successful ECPR depends on minimizing time to ECMO initiation and selecting appropriate patients. While several aspects are consistent across countries, ECPR protocols vary in logistics, team composition, cannulation methods, and monitoring, which may influence patient-important outcomes such as survival and neurological recovery. This narrative review explores current global practices in ECPR, and identifies opportunities for standardization while recognizing elements that should remain context specific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.