ReviewInternational journal of burns and trauma2026
A systematic review of burn-related mortality and morbidity along with preventive strategies existing in the Arabian Peninsula over the last 5 years.
Review in International journal of burns and trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review looks at burn injuries in the Gulf region over the past five years, focusing on how often they occur, their survival and complication rates, and current prevention efforts. To gather the data, two reviewers independently searched five major databases and checked article reference lists to make sure no relevant studies were missed. The team then used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality and potential bias of the gathered research. The following sections present these regional findings and discuss the need for better burn management systems and stronger prevention strategies across the Gulf countries.
objectives(1) To examine burn epidemiology. (2) To assess morbidity and mortality. (3) And to cover preventative strategies in the gulf countries (Qatar, UAE, Oman, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia) over the past 5 years.
methods(1) Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers utilizing a standardized form. To ensure data integrity, this instrument was initially piloted on three studies, with iterative modifications implemented as necessary before full-scale deployment. (2) A systematic literature search was conducted across five major electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. To ensure literature saturation, the reference lists of all relevant articles were manually screened to identify additional eligible studies.
results(1) A quantitative meta-analysis was precluded by substantial heterogeneity in study methodologies, patient cohorts, and outcome assessments. Regarding methodological quality, twelve trials (60%) exhibited a moderate risk of bias, while two demonstrated a low risk and four presented a high risk. Evaluation via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) indicated that nine to ten studies maintained high transparency in both data collection and methodological reporting. (2) Highest rate of mortality was found in saudi arabia (17.6%) and second highest in Kuwait (10.9%).
conclusions(1) There is a high degree of variation in burn epidemiology, mortality, and prognosis among various Gulf countries. Which emphasizes a need for a uniform burn management system. (2) To effectively reduce burn-related morbidity and mortality, a comprehensive escalation of current preventative strategies is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.