ArticleGlobal & regional health technology assessment
Burden of primary biliary cholangitis on the Italian National Health Service: retrospective analysis from an administrative database.
Article in Global & regional health technology assessment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare, chronic, cholestatic, autoimmune, and disabling liver disease whose treatments are aimed at reducing its progression.The aim was to describe patients with PBC, their healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs on the Italian National Health Service (SSN). Methods: From an Italian administrative healthcare database (~5.5 million inhabitants), called ReS Db, patients with PBC in 2021 (prevalent) were selected by specific codes and described by demographics, comorbidities, one-year HCRU, and health sector costs charged to the SSN. The 3-year treatment pattern was evaluated in a cohort of patients newly diagnosed in 2019 (incident). Results: In 2021, 1375 patients with PBC were identified (prevalence: 28.2/100,000; females: 74.2%; mean age: 64 ± 15 years). During one-year follow-up of the prevalent cohort: 73.1% received ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA); 3.0% obeticholic acid (OCA), and 3.4% off-label drugs; 19.9% were hospitalized, mainly for cirrhosis-related conditions; 61.2% were examined by a specialist. The annual mean cost was €4422/patient; drugs for PBC, concomitant drugs, and hospitalizations accounted for 12.1%, 31.7%, and 43.6% of total cost, respectively. Among the 40 incident patients, 38 (95%) received UDCA as first-line therapy. Conclusion: The study described the real-world impact of PBC in Italy from the perspective of the SSN and highlighted the burden and therapeutic needs of patients treated with UDCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.