ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2026
The effectiveness of hydrotherapy on quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with cardiac diseases: a scoping review.
Review in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although hydrotherapy is an alternative treatment for people with heart conditions, it is still unknown how hydrotherapy would affect these patients' quality of life and ability to exercise. The aim of this review is to investigate the impact of hydrotherapy on heart disease patients. A search of the databases PubMed, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), EBSCO, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining how hydrotherapy affects people with heart conditions. The PEDro scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the research for bias risk. This scoping review comprised eleven studies with a total of 245 cardiac patients. Hydrotherapy reduced heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and cardiac index in patients with chronic heart failure and increased exercise tolerance, peak power output, and total body strength in male patients with coronary artery disease. It also improved work rate, cardiac output, stroke volume, exercise and walking capacity, and peak oxygen uptake. The risk of bias assessment revealed that one study was excellent quality, eight studies were good quality, and two were poor quality. Hydrotherapy is an effective physical therapy modality for the rehabilitation of patients with cardiac diseases. However, further, larger studies with less heterogeneity are required due to the low-quality studies and low-quality evidence to confirm the findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms of hydrotherapy in cardiac patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.