ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Phylogenetic relationships and antimicrobial susceptibility of human- and parrot-derived
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chlamydia psittaci is an important zoonotic pathogen mainly transmitted to humans through exposure to infected birds or contaminated bird excreta, and infection may range from mild respiratory illness to severe systemic disease. Method: Between 2023 and 2024, 114 samples were collected in Shenzhen, China, including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from four laboratory-confirmed psittacosis patients, five tissue samples from one suspected infected parrot, and 105 oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs from parrots in a local bird market. C. psittaci was detected by conventional PCR targeting ompA. Positive samples were subjected to targeted capture sequencing, isolation in McCoy cells, ompA-based genotyping, whole-genome SNP phylogenetic analysis, and intracellular antibiotic inhibition assays. Results: C. psittaci DNA was detected in 42 samples, of which 19 yielded high-quality genomic sequence data. Three isolates were successfully cultured: SZ1 from parrot trachea, SZ2 from parrot small-intestinal mucosa, and SZ3 from BALF from Case 1. Phylogenetic analyses based on ompA and genome-wide SNPs showed that all three isolates belonged to genotype A and clarified their relationships with previously reported strains. No known acquired antimicrobial resistance genes were identified, but nucleotide substitutions were detected at selected loci previously reported to be potentially associated with antimicrobial susceptibility. Comparative intracellular inhibition assays showed different antibiotic response patterns between the parrot-derived isolate SZ1 and the human-derived isolate SZ3; SZ1 showed a less pronounced inhibitory response to doxycycline under the present in vitro conditions, suggesting reduced doxycycline susceptibility rather than confirmed resistance. Discussion: These findings highlight the value of genomic surveillance and antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of C. psittaci isolates from both avian reservoirs and human infections, which may support risk assessment and clinical management of psittacosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.