ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Foot-and-mouth disease virus non-structural protein antibody detection: from DIVA serology to repeated-epitope design and multi-species field surveillance.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in vaccinated populations requires tests that distinguish vaccine-induced immunity from infection-associated exposure. Structural protein antibodies help assess vaccine response and serotype-specific protection, whereas antibodies to foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) non-structural proteins (NSPs) support DIVA (differentiating infected from vaccinated animals) interpretation only when vaccine purity and vaccination history are considered. Residual NSPs in incompletely purified vaccines, repeated vaccination, antibody kinetics, host species and assay cut-offs all influence interpretation. This Mini Review examines NSP antibody detection based on 3ABC, 3B/VPg repeated-epitope design, complementary NSP targets, competitive or blocking ELISA, multi-species-compatible assays and emerging field-deployable formats. It does not rank platforms as universally superior; instead, it considers reported performance, validation context and field setting. NSP serology is most useful when combined with vaccination records, structural protein serology, RT-qPCR and epidemiological investigation. It can flag possible subclinical exposure or post-outbreak risk, but it is not a standalone test for current shedding, persistent infection or carrier status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.