ArticleFrontiers in neurology
The effect of concurrent neural injuries on hemorrhage.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is often accompanied by additional tissue damage (polytrauma) that amplifies inflammation and activates pain pathways. The latter has been studied by engaging nociceptive fibers using electrical stimulation or capsaicin caudal to a thoracic SCI. Nociceptive stimulation 1 day after SCI increases hemorrhage, amplifying secondary tissue loss. Noxious stimulation also promotes hemorrhage after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). A common form of polytrauma after SCI involves a TBI. The current study examines whether a concurrent TBI promotes hemorrhage after SCI. This also allowed us to evaluate whether a concurrent SCI promotes brain hemorrhage after TBI. Methods: Animals received a thoracic SCI and a concurrent brain surgery (anesthesia alone, craniectomy, or TBI). Other animals received a TBI to the frontal region and a concurrent spinal surgery (anesthesia alone, laminectomy, or SCI). Tissue was collected 24 h later, sectioned, and the extent of brain/spinal cord hemorrhage was quantified. Sham controls were included to verify a remote injury (SCI/TBI) does not induce hemorrhage in the absence of local neural damage. Results: A concurrent TBI with a SCI amplified hemorrhage in the spinal cord. A craniectomy had an intermediate effect on hemorrhage. Additionally, concurrent SCI with a TBI increased hemorrhage in the brain with a more modest effect. Conclusion: The results provide a link between hemorrhage development and concurrent neural injuries, with greater hemorrhage observed after SCI in animals with a concurrent TBI. SCI modestly impacted hemorrhage after TBI. These results provide a basis to further investigate the mechanisms responsible for interactions between multiple neurotraumatic injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.