Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488332›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2026

Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and cell morphology in determining the histogenesis of salivary gland lesions.

Bisharah Soudah, Mahmoud Abbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bisharah SoudahInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany.
Mahmoud AbbasGerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Münster, D-48149 Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of suspicious salivary and neck swellings is a simple and cost-effective diagnostic method for the evaluation of inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNA cytology (FNAC) in determining the histogenesis of salivary gland lesions based on cytomorphological features and associated histopathological outcomes to refine diagnostic criteria and contribute to improved diagnostic accuracy in salivary gland cytopathology. FNA was performed in 544 patients at the Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School (Hannover, Germany). The cytological smears were stained with May-Grunwald Giemsa, Papanicolaou and periodic acid-Schiff and compared with histological specimens from the same patients using immunohistochemical and molecular methods. The samples were anonymized and analyzed retrospectively. Of the total cases, 422 (77.57%) were benign lesions, 59 (10.85%) were malignant lesions and 26 (4.78%) were normal cases. Insufficient material was obtained in 37/544 cases (6.80%). No complications were observed. The concordance with histological findings for neoplastic lesions was >97.5%, with a false negative rate of 1.7%. The sensitivity of the diagnostic methods was 94% and the specificity was 98%. Of the 544 cases, 283 were female (52%) and 261 were male (48%). The diagnostic value of FNAC in representative material was relatively high in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. Sensitivity and specificity were variable (60.0-97.5%). Correct diagnosis in the head and neck region requires interdisciplinary integration of findings and pathological-clinical cooperation.

Indexed as

fine needle aspiration cytologymorphological and diagnostic hallmarksalivary gland tumor

Identifiers

PMID42488332
PMCPMC13389693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.