ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2026
Effect of Postoperative Weightbearing on Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with The Femoral Neck System: A Comparative Cohort Study.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative weightbearing management of patients surgically treated for femoral neck fractures is controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients treated with a fixed-angle implant, the Femoral Neck System (FNS), as a function of their postoperative weightbearing protocol. Methods: A comparative cohort study of patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures who underwent fixation with the FNS at a Level I trauma center from 2019 to 2023 was conducted. Patients were assigned to either the weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) group or the toe-touch weightbearing (TTWB) group based on surgeon preference after each procedure. Primary outcome measures were postoperative complications and the need for revision surgery. Secondary outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, SF-12 score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score. Results: There were 25 patients in the WBAT group and 19 in the TTWB group. Ten of 25 (40%) fracture union complications occurred in the WBAT cohort compared with 6 of 19 (32%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.565). Revision surgeries were required in 7 of 25 cases (28%) in the WBAT cohort compared with 3 of 19 (16%) in the TTWB group (p = 0.339). No statistically significant differences in VAS pain scores, SF-12 scores, or WOMAC scores between the groups were found. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in radiographic complications, reoperations, or functional outcome scores between the two postoperative weightbearing protocols. Our findings suggest that WBAT may be permitted in this patient cohort, thereby simplifying postoperative care for patients and surgeons. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42488314PMC13389641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.