ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2026
Do Far Cortical Locking Screws in Locking Plates Lead to Earlier and Increased Medial Callus in Distal Femur Fractures Comparing to Standard Locking Screws?
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Locking plates (LP) are commonly used to treat distal femur fracture. Far cortical locking (FCL) screws are designed to increase axial motion at the fracture site resulting in more callus formation in animal study. In our previous study, progress to healing was assessed. There were statistically significant differences in modified RUST score postoperatively with higher scores in the FCL group. However, the amount of callus formed was not quantitatively measured. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively assess the medial callus area (mm Methods: A retrospective review of medical records conducted to identify patients with distal femur fractures. Medial callus area from AP radiographs was quantified from 6-, 12- and 24-week postop radiographs using OrthoRead software. Medial callus areas were compared between FCL construct fixation and traditional LP. Results: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 69 patients with 70 total fractures were included for analysis. There were no significant differences between FCL (n=42) and LP (n=28) in demographic data or rates of complications (18%), fixation failures (10%), union (90%), or revision (10%) (all p>0.05). Medial callus areas did not significantly differ after adjustment for multiple comparisons between FCL vs. LP at 6 (195.2 mm Conclusion: In this study, there is increased callus generated in FCL vs LP constructs at 24 weeks postoperatively (p=0.02). This is in accordance with previous animal models. However clinical advantages of this increased callus were not identified in the study. Because of the study limitations and potential confounders, prospective studies are necessary to further assess whether there is a clinically relevant healing advantage of FCL over standard LP constructs. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42488305PMC13389674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.