ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2026
Distinct Clinical Presentations of Trunnionosis with and Without Gross Trunnion Failure Following Mechanically Assisted Crevice Corrosion in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) is a rare but serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluated differences in symptoms and clinical presentation of trunnionosis with and without gross trunnion failure (GTF) in patients revised for MACC involving the Accolade I titanium-molybdenumzirconium-iron (TMZF) femoral stem paired with a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) low-friction ion treatment (LFIT) femoral head. Methods: This retrospective chart review included 73 patients (82 hips) who underwent revision THA due to MACC from the Accolade I femoral stem and LFIT CoCr femoral head. Patients were categorized into groups-trunnionosis alone (trun-nionosis group) and trunnionosis with GTF (GTF group)-based on radiographic and intraoperative findings. Baseline patient demographics, implant characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Continuous variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, and categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Qualitative data was collected from clinic and operative notes. Results: Overall, patients with GTF were more frequently male (77% vs. 44%), taller (177.2 vs. 171.0 cm), and had a longer interval from primary to revision surgery (10.0 vs. 7.2 years). They reported markedly shorter symptom duration (3.1 vs. 8.9 months) and were far less likely to experience chronic pain (38% vs. 97%), with several presenting as asymptomatic until catastrophic failure. Patients with trunnionosis typically described months of aching or radiating pain, whereas patients with GTF characterized their symptoms as sharp or deep when present at all, reflecting sudden mechanical failure. Despite differing presentations, postoperative patient reported outcomes and metal ion levels improved similarly in both groups. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that trunnionosis and GTF have distinct clinical presentations. Trunnionosis tends to present earlier with persistent, radiating pain and prolonged symptoms, while GTF tends to occur later, with minimal or no pain, and an increased risk of sudden mechanical failure. Recognizing these contrasting presentations is critical for early diagnosis and prevention of MACC events through timely surveillance and intervention. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42488304PMC13389542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.