ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2026
Plate Augmentation in The Prevention of 3D-Printed Tritanium Cage Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interbody cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery can be associated with increased pain, segmental kyphosis, accelerated adjacent segment disease, and decreased rates of fusion. This study investigated the incidence of cage subsidence following the use of cages using Tritanium technology as cage-only (CO) or cage-plate (CP) constructs in patients undergoing ACDF. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Data was collected from hospital records and radiographs. All patients undergoing ACDF for cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy were included. Patients were divided into two groups by ACDF construct: CO and CP groups. Outcome measures included postoperative cage subsidence, presence of fusion, and surgical complications. Cage subsidence was calculated as the decrease in intervertebral height. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t-test for continuous data and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Results: 76 patients were included with mean age 56.5 years at surgery (SD: + 12; range: 2981), comprising a total of 94 ACDF procedures. Single-level ACDF was performed in 61 patients and multilevel ACDF was performed in 15 patients. CO construct was used in 13 ACDFs and CP construct used in 81 ACDFs. Mean radiological followup was 8.5 months (SD: 6.3; range: 3-24). Cage subsidence rate was greater in CO group compared to CP group (CO 54% (n=7), 95% CI: 29-77%; CP 19% (n=15), 95% CI 12-28% (x Conclusion: Incidence of cage subsidence was greater when Tritanium cages were used for ACDF surgery as cage-only constructs compared to cageplate constructs. Correlation of these results with patient-reported outcomes would be valuable. Level of Evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42488296PMC13389275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.