ArticleCureus2026
Giant Cavernous Hepatic Hemangioma Masking a Separate Pleural Empyema: A Diagnostic Pitfall and Anchoring Bias.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant cavernous hepatic hemangiomas may occasionally demonstrate atypical imaging characteristics that mimic malignant or infectious hepatic lesions, creating diagnostic uncertainty and increasing the risk of anchoring bias. We report the case of a 41-year-old male who presented with fever, pleuritic chest pain, leukocytosis, and a large right pleural effusion following CT-guided lung biopsy. Imaging revealed a large hepatic lesion with atypical radiographic features concerning for malignancy or disseminated infection, along with pulmonary inflammatory changes and empyema. Thoracentesis yielded pleural fluid concerning for empyema. Given the constellation of findings, the hepatic lesion initially dominated diagnostic reasoning and raised concern for a unifying metastatic or infectious process. However, liver biopsy ultimately confirmed cavernous hepatic hemangioma, while pulmonary biopsy demonstrated inflammatory changes without evidence of malignancy. Histopathologic evaluation established that the hepatic lesion was incidental and unrelated to the patient's acute illness, whereas the empyema was most likely secondary to the recent thoracic intervention. This case highlights the importance of avoiding anchoring bias and recognizing concurrent but unrelated disease processes when evaluating complex clinical presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.