ArticleCureus2026
Forensic Significance of Sternal Fusion in Adult Age Estimation: An Autopsy Study in North India.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge estimation is an important component of forensic identification, particularly in cases involving unknown, decomposed, mutilated, or skeletonized human remains. Following completion of skeletal maturity, commonly used indicators such as epiphyseal fusion become less reliable, making evaluation of other skeletal structures necessary. The sternum is considered useful in forensic age estimation because of its resistance to decomposition and progressive fusion changes during adult life. The present study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between age and fusion of different sternal elements in the North Indian population. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care centre of southern Haryana, India. A total of 115 medico-legal autopsy cases of known age, aged 15 years and above, were included in the study. The sternum was dissected during autopsy, and the fusion status of the body of the sternum, xiphisternal joint, and manubriosternal joint was assessed grossly. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), and associations between fusion patterns and age groups were evaluated using Pearson's Chi-square test.
resultsFusion of the body of the sternum was observed in almost all cases and did not show a statistically significant association with age (p = 0.910). In contrast, fusion of the xiphisternal joint and manubriosternal joint increased progressively with advancing age. Chi-square analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between xiphisternal joint fusion and advancing age (χ² = 10.152, p = 0.038), while manubriosternal joint fusion approached statistical significance (χ² = 7.467, p = 0.058). Xiphisternal fusion was absent below 25 years and became progressively more frequent in older age groups, whereas manubriosternal fusion was predominantly observed after 35 years of age. Female cadavers demonstrated slightly earlier and higher fusion rates in advanced age groups compared to male cadavers. Binary logistic regression demonstrated that xiphisternal and manubriosternal fusion were significant independent predictors of age ≥45 years, with the combined model showing excellent discriminatory ability (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.896).
conclusionFusions of the xiphisternal and manubriosternal joints are potential supportive indicators demonstrating significant age-associated trends, particularly beyond the fourth decade of life. Fusion of the body of the sternum has limited forensic significance because of its early completion and lack of progressive age-related variation. Assessment of sternal fusion should be interpreted in conjunction with other skeletal indicators and population-specific standards for improved medico-legal accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.