ReviewCureus2026
Self-Ligating Brackets, Friction Reduction, Treatment Acceleration, and Patient-Centered Outcomes: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-ligating brackets (SLBs) have emerged as an important innovation in contemporary orthodontics, offering the potential to minimize frictional resistance, improve biomechanical efficiency, and enhance patient-centered treatment outcomes. Unlike conventional brackets, which rely on elastomeric or metallic ligatures to engage the archwire, SLBs incorporate an inbuilt locking mechanism that permits freer wire movement and reduced binding during sliding mechanics. This narrative review examines the biomechanical principles, clinical efficacy, and future potential of SLB systems. Evidence supports several advantages, including reduced friction, improved alignment efficiency, shortened chairside time, better oral hygiene maintenance, and improved patient comfort. Reduced frictional resistance may also allow the use of lighter, more physiologic orthodontic forces, thereby promoting favorable periodontal responses. Despite strong in vitro evidence of improved mechanical performance, clinical trials and systematic reviews have reported mixed results regarding reductions in total treatment time and long-term superiority over conventional systems. The growing integration of digital orthodontics, AI, and personalized appliance technologies holds promise for further enhancing the clinical utility of SLBs. Large-scale randomized controlled trials with standardized methodology remain necessary to establish definitive conclusions on long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.