ArticleCureus2026
Posterior Canal and Atypical Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: Development of a Predictive Model for Clinical Decision-Making.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of dizziness. Despite its prevalence, clinical diagnosis can be challenging because of difficulty discerning the direction and intensity of eye movements, resulting in diagnostic uncertainty and suboptimal treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a data-driven model designed to differentiate between typical and atypical variants of BPPV.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional design included data from 26 patients diagnosed clinically with either typical BPPV or atypical variants of BPPV and two control subjects with a history of dizziness but no vertigo. Eye and head movement data were extracted using VisualEyes™ (Interacoustics, Middelfart, Denmark) and processed in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, United States). Latency and peak slow-phase velocity (SPV) of torsional nystagmus were used as predictors in a logistic regression model. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and repeated five-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe final model, based on latency and peak SPV of torsional nystagmus, achieved a mean AUC of 0.936±0.007, indicating excellent discrimination between typical and atypical BPPV. Across cross-validation folds, the model demonstrated a mean accuracy of 88.0%±0.9%, a sensitivity of 78.2%±1.9%, and a specificity of 93.9%±1.1%, reflecting a consistently high rate of correct classification. When evaluated on four previously unseen patient recordings outside the training dataset, the model showed 100% agreement with expert clinical assessments.
conclusionThe developed model demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating typical BPPV from atypical variants and shows promise as a clinical decision support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.