Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488248›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Digital Inclusion and Women's Health Indicators Across Indian States: An Ecological Analysis of National Family Health Survey 2019-2021 Data.

Hafsa Zahoor, Rameez Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hafsa ZahoorObstetrics and Gynecology, Acharya Shri Chander College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Jammu, IND.
Rameez AhmedEndocrinology and Metabolism, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital inclusion may influence how women access health information and health services, but state-level evidence linking women's digital inclusion with women's health indicators in India remains limited. This study examined ecological associations between women's internet use, women's own mobile phone use, and selected women's health indicators across Indian states and union territories.

methodsThis ecological cross-sectional secondary analysis used an uploaded aggregated National Family Health Survey 2019-2021 (NFHS-5) state-level dataset. The India aggregate was excluded, leaving 36 states and union territories. Primary exposures were women who had ever used the internet and women having a mobile phone that they themselves use. Priority outcomes included menstrual hygiene, anemia, maternal health, contraception, and cancer screening indicators. Descriptive statistics, Pearson and Spearman correlations, simple linear regression, exploratory education-adjusted models, and NFHS-4 to NFHS-5 change analyses were conducted.

resultsAmong 36 states and union territories, women's internet use ranged from 20.6% in Bihar to 76.7% in Sikkim, while women's own mobile phone use ranged from 38.5% in Madhya Pradesh to 91.2% in Goa. Menstrual hygiene was moderately and positively correlated with internet use (Pearson r = 0.615, p < 0.001) and mobile phone use (r = 0.583, p < 0.001). Anemia among women aged 15-49 years was negatively correlated with internet use (r = -0.432, p = 0.009) and mobile phone use (r = -0.464, p = 0.004). Maternal health, contraception, and cancer screening indicators showed weaker and less consistent associations. In exploratory models adjusted for women's schooling, the associations with menstrual hygiene and anemia were substantially attenuated and were no longer statistically significant.

conclusionHigher women's digital inclusion was ecologically associated with better menstrual hygiene and lower anemia prevalence across Indian states and union territories, but associations were weaker for several service-use outcomes. These findings are ecological and should not be interpreted as individual-level or causal evidence. Digital inclusion should be considered part of a broader social and health system context for women's health equity.

Indexed as

anemiacancer screeningcontraceptiondigital inclusionindiainternet usematernal healthmenstrual hygienemobile phonenfhs-5

Identifiers

PMID42488248
PMCPMC13390612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.