ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Effect of nusinersen on respiratory function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: an 18-month single-center prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe neuromuscular disease characterized by respiratory muscle weakness, often leading to high mortality. Research on the effect of nusinersen on respiratory function in SMA patients remains scarce. Objective: To evaluate nusinersen's effect on respiratory function in SMA patients and provide a clinical basis for respiratory management. Methods: In this single-center prospective study, clinical data were collected from SMA patients in our pediatric department. Respiratory function, expressed as absolute values and percentages of predicted values (%pred), and active cough strength was evaluated at baseline and during follow-up after nusinersen treatment. Treatment effects were subsequently analyzed. Results: Among 59 SMA patients (39 Type II; 20 Type III), 40 completed baseline respiratory tests, of whom 67.5% had abnormal respiratory function. Type II patients had significantly lower VC %pred, FVC %pred, FEV1%pred, PEF %pred, FEF25%pred, and FEF50%pred than Type III patients (all Conclusion: Most SMA patients had impaired respiratory function, which was more severe in Type II than Type III patients. Nusinersen improved respiratory function and active cough strength, but could not fully reverse the progression of restrictive ventilatory dysfunction, especially in Type II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.