ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Comparative structural characterization and protective effects against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury of polysaccharides from two major Chinese yam cultivars (
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chinese yam ( Methods: The molecular weight distribution, monosaccharide composition, UV-visible spectra, and FT-IR characteristics of the two polysaccharide fractions were compared. Their protective effects were evaluated in H9c2 cells subjected to oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) and in a rat model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MI/RI). Furthermore, transcriptomics, proteomics, and Western blotting were integrated to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Results: CYP-XBZ and CYP-TG exhibited broadly similar molecular weight distribution patterns, glucan-dominant monosaccharide compositions, and characteristic polysaccharide spectral features. However, minor differences in molecular heterogeneity and monosaccharide proportions were observed. In OGD/R-treated H9c2 cells, both fractions significantly improved cell viability and reduced CK-MB, cTnT, and 8-OHdG levels. Multi-omics analyses revealed that the shared protective effects were mainly associated with stress and inflammation-related pathways, particularly the MyD88-associated MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. These findings were further confirmed by Western blotting. In the rat model of MI/RI, oral administration of both polysaccharide fractions reduced infarct size and alleviated histopathological injury. They also decreased serum biomarkers of myocardial injury and oxidative stress. Conclusion: Polysaccharides from the two major Chinese yam cultivars showed highly comparable structural features, cardio protective effects, and regulatory mechanisms. These findings support the functional consistency of these cultivars as sources of bioactive polysaccharides and highlight their potential as food-derived functional ingredients for cardiovascular and nutrition-related health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.