Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488202›Full record

ArticleGlobal bioethics = Problemi di bioetica2026

What might Confucius say? Digital doppelgängers for people who are newly dead, dying, or comatose.

Nancy S Jecker, Jing-Bao Nie, Anita Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nancy S JeckerDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5642-748X
Jing-Bao NieDunedin School of Medicine, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1570-2254
Anita HoBioethics Program, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-1326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores what Confucius might say about the use of generative AI-based digital doppelgängers in healthcare for patients who are newly dead, dying, or comatose. We focus on the use of these technologies to support patients' family members, loved ones, and surrogate decision-makers. Since Confucian approaches are largely missing from bioethics discussions of AI-based digital doppelgängers and patient preference predictors, this paper helps to fill an important gap. Section I introduces three cases involving digital doppelgängers representing people who are newly dead, dying, or comatose. Section II considers a Confucian response to the three cases. Section III applies Confucian values to a further situation, where the digital doppelgänger for a comatose patient functions as a patient preference predictor helping with a surrogate decision for a comatose patient. Section IV sets forth ethical benchmarks for using digital doppelgängers in healthcare. Section V recommends proceeding with caution and highlights the importance of further understanding the benefits and risks of using these tools in diverse cultural contexts.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Confucian ethicsdeath and dyingdeathbotsdigital doppelgängersgenerative AIpatient preference predictor (P3)surrogate decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42488202
PMCPMC13390177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.