Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488197›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026

Football, fossil fuels, and public health in the era of climate crisis.

Manolis Kogevinas, Neil Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manolis KogevinasEnvironment and Health over the Lifecourse Program, ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-0461
Neil PearceDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global professional football (soccer in the United States) is increasingly integrated with fossil fuel-derived capital through club ownership, expansive sponsorship deals, and tournament hosting. While often discussed in ethical or political terms, these developments have received limited attention from an environmental health perspective. This commentary examines the growing alignment between fossil fuel-derived wealth and global football, focusing primarily on club ownership, while situating it within a broader ecosystem of commercial and geopolitical influence. We argue that these relationships function as a commercial determinant of health by shaping social norms, legitimizing carbon-intensive industries, and delaying policy action on climate change. Drawing parallels to the historical regulation of tobacco sponsorship, we highlight how such dynamics contribute to the persistence of exposures that drive climate-related health risks. Climate change is the great public health challenge of the 21st century, just as tobacco was in the 20th century. Greater scrutiny, transparency, and leadership from the public health community with regard to fossil fuel-derived funding of sport are warranted. It is no longer acceptable for major sporting bodies and events to accept tobacco industry funding. It should also be unacceptable for them to accept fossil fuel-derived funding.

Indexed as

Climate changeCommercial determinants of healthEnvironmental healthFossil fuelsSports sponsorship

Identifiers

PMID42488197
PMCPMC13391143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.