ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
In silico Identification of Natural Compounds as Potential TrkA Inhibitors for Anticancer Drug Development.
Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase A (TrkA) is essential for cancer cell migration and for stabilizing focal adhesions required for attachment to the extracellular matrix. However, resistance to inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding pocket of the TrkA kinase domain complicates treatment. These inhibitors block ATP binding, which is required for TrkA activation, thereby disrupting downstream signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival in cancers characterized by TrkA overexpression or mutation. Objectives: This study aimed to identify natural compounds as potential TrkA inhibitors for anticancer drug development. The identified compounds exhibited higher binding affinity and greater stability than the control compounds. Methods: Virtual screening, molecular dynamics simulations, MM-GBSA free energy calculations, and principal component analysis were performed using the Schrödinger Desmond software to screen a comprehensive library from the NPACT and PhytoHub databases for potential novel TrkA inhibitors. Results: Two promising inhibitors derived from natural compounds, PHUB000399 and NPACT01417, were identified. Toxicity assessments indicated that both compounds had lower toxicity levels (class 5) than Entrectinib, the reference inhibitor (class 4); the molecular weights of PHUB000399, NPACT01417, and Entrectinib were 275.25, 316.35, and 560.64 g/mol, respectively. Docking studies showed that PHUB000399 and NPACT01417 had superior binding affinities, with grid scores of -13.239 and -13.103, respectively, compared with the co-crystal ligand (-12.567) and Entrectinib (-10.996). Molecular dynamics simulations indicated that the TrkA-PHUB000399 and TrkA-NPACT01417 complexes were more stable than the TrkA-Entrectinib complex. The calculated binding free energies for TrkA-PHUB000399 and TrkA-NPACT01417 were -87.74 and -86.09 kcal/mol, respectively, exceeding those of the co-crystal ligand (-84.14 kcal/mol) and Entrectinib (-73.03 kcal/mol). Conclusions: These findings suggest that NPACT01417 and PHUB000399 are promising candidates for targeting cancer cell migration, with binding affinities comparable to those of established inhibitors. This study provides valuable insights for the development of effective anticancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.