Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488183›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Geographic and demographic gaps in publicly available Alzheimer's disease datasets: A large language model-based discovery and analysis.

Mansi Singhal, Joanna Lin, Megan Delehanty, Ali Karimi, Leticia Rittner, Mariana Bento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mansi SinghalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2395-2956
Joanna LinDepartment of Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4764-4341
Megan DelehantyDepartment of Philosophy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-7828
Ali KarimiDepartment of Communication, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6601-7006
Leticia RittnerSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8182-5554
Mariana BentoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-0294

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects millions worldwide, and researchers heavily rely on datasets for diagnosis and treatment. Identifying relevant datasets is challenging due to data gaps and bias related to the demographics and geographic origin. Method: We investigated AD data gaps by identifying and manually curating publicly accessible AD datasets containing imaging and/or tabular data. We also extracted key information such as data availability, geographic location, and participant demographics. We used five Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify AD datasets, allowing us to explore potential datasets while also evaluating retrieval consistency across models. Result: We identified 24 publicly accessible AD datasets (open access or controlled access via registration). These datasets enabled us to emphasize three critical gaps: (1) variability in AD dataset retrieval, as observed through differences in LLM outputs, related to dataset visibility and accessibility; (2) geographical imbalance, with North America contributing 55.6% of datasets, US alone 66.7%, followed by Europe at 36.1%, and smaller shares from South America 11.1%, Asia 8.3%, and Africa 2.8%; and (3) demographic deficits, with the majority of datasets predominantly White, as 9 of 24 had over 80% White participants. Among the seven datasets that reported any Black participant representation, the proportion of Black participants ranged from 15.3% to 18.8%. Conclusion: These findings reveal significant disparities in the availability and retrieval of AD datasets, with most data concentrated in Western countries and critical gaps in demographic representation. LLMs show inconsistent retrieval, particularly for newer, smaller, or region-specific datasets, which may perpetuate existing biases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasedata gapsdemographic representationengineeringgeographical imbalancelarge language modelsprompt

Identifiers

PMID42488183
PMCPMC13389145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.