Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488165›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22026

Ablation lesion patterns in atrial fibrillation: A cardiac MRI comparison of different ablation strategies.

Nikki van Pouderoijen, Marisa van der Graaf, Bob G S Abeln, Michiel J B Kemme, Max Liebregts, Lucas V A Boersma, Cornelis P Allaart, Luuk H G A Hopman, Marco J W Götte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikki van PouderoijenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marisa van der GraafDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bob G S AbelnDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel J B KemmeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max LiebregtsDepartment of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Lucas V A BoersmaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis P AllaartDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luuk H G A HopmanDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco J W GötteDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation can be performed using various ablation strategies, including point-by-point radiofrequency (RF) and single-shot ablation techniques. However, the resulting lesion characteristics of these approaches are not yet fully understood. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) provides a noninvasive means to assess atrial ablation lesions. Objective: This study aimed to characterize ablation modality-specific left atrial LGE-CMR lesion patterns. Methods: Ablation lesion patterns of 42 patients were evaluated on LGE-CMR acquired 3 months after PV isolation was performed with point-by-point moderate-power moderate-duration RF, very-high-power short-duration RF, RF balloon, ultralow-temperature cryoablation, or pulsed field ablation (PFA). Left atrial LGE images were visually assessed and also postprocessed using the full-width half-maximum method for lesion quantification, with gap detection defined by a ≥40% threshold to assess lesion completeness. Results: Point-by-point RF ablation produced the most continuous LGE lesion patterns, whereas single-shot thermal techniques created broader but less continuous ablation lesions. PFA generated the widest and most heterogeneous patterns, with quantitative analysis confirming a high prevalence and large gap lengths in single-shot ablation groups, most prominently in the PFA group (total LGE encirclement: moderate-power moderate-duration 77.2% ± 10.1%; very-high-power short-duration 82.8% ± 12.4%; RF balloon 76.2% ± 11.6%; ultralow-temperature cryoablation 62.0% ± 9.9%; and PFA 60.2% ± 13.7%). Conclusion: LGE-CMR reveals modality-specific lesion patterns, with point-by-point RF showing the most continuous PV encirclement. PFA demonstrated variable lesion visualization, likely influenced by system differences and challenges in detecting nonthermal injury. The relationship between CMR-defined lesions and outcomes remains uncertain, underscoring the need for standardized imaging with emerging energy sources.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCardiac MRILate gadolinium enhancementLesion characterizationPulmonary vein isolationPulsed field ablation

Identifiers

PMID42488165
PMCPMC13390004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.