ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Predicting ventricular arrhythmia in myocardial ischemia using deep learning.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Myocardial ischemia can trigger ventricular arrhythmias with life-threatening consequences. Current monitoring is largely reactive, limiting opportunities for preventive intervention. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether high-resolution epicardial electrograms contain predictive signatures that enable forecasting the timing of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) during acute ischemia, and to quantify subject-specific data requirements for effective personalization. Methods: We analyzed epicardial sock electrograms (247 electrodes, 1 kHz) from 21 porcine acute ischemia experiments comprising 2252 spontaneous PVCs. Signals were segmented into overlapping sequences of 3, 5, or 7 consecutive non-PVC beats with a continuous target of time-to-next PVC. A 6-layer long short-term memory network (hidden size 128) with temporal attention was trained using mean absolute error (MAE). Performance was evaluated in (A) pooled 80/10/10 cross-validation and (B) leave-1-experiment-out testing with subject-specific fine-tuning using 10% or 15% of held-out data. Results: In Paradigm A, MAE decreased with longer context (6.50 seconds for 3 beats, 5.97 seconds for 5 beats, and 4.73 seconds for 7 beats) with excellent calibration ( Conclusion: Epicardial electrograms support accurate PVC time-to-event forecasting during acute ischemia, and modest subject-specific adaptation substantially improves generalization, motivating development of real-time predictive monitoring tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.