ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Preliminary exploration on using entropy-weighted hybrid pooling in CNN for ultrasound breast cancer detection.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Breast ultrasound imaging is valuable for its non-invasiveness and cost-effectiveness but presents diagnostic challenges from speckle noise and limited contrast. Conventional CNN pooling methods compromise between noise reduction and feature preservation. Methods: We introduce an adaptive entropy-weighted hybrid pooling approach that dynamically combines Max and Average pooling based on local image complexity measured by Shannon entropy. Two CNN architectures (3-block and 4-block) were evaluated on a publicly available ultrasound dataset of 9,016 images with an additional 10% speckle-noise variant, using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, ROC curves, confusion matrices, and inference time. For the 3-block CNN, results are reported as the mean ± standard deviation over three random seeds. Results: In the 3-block CNN, hybrid pooling achieved an accuracy of 93.98% ± 1.72% (AUC = 0.9870), exceeding max pooling (92.72% ± 0.85%, AUC = 0.9815). In the deeper 4-block CNN (single-run), hybrid pooling remained competitive (accuracy 92.90%) relative to max pooling (94.79%). Deeper architectures improved accuracy, noise robustness, and convergence but required careful regularization to avoid overfitting. Discussion: This preliminary study highlights the adaptive hybrid pooling's potential in clinical ultrasound breast cancer diagnosis, recommending further validation and clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.