Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488075›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Eating on camera: a creator-centric case study of mukbang engagement in India.

Gayatri Batra, Paweł A Atroszko, Gayatri Kotbagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gayatri BatraDepartment of Psychological Sciences, FLAME University, Pune, India.
Paweł A AtroszkoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, FLAME University, Pune, India.
Gayatri KotbagiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, FLAME University, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mukbang, a global digital phenomenon in which individuals consume large quantities of food on camera, has gained increasing popularity across cultural contexts. Despite its growth in India, limited research has examined mukbang through the perspective of content creators. The present study addresses this gap through an in-depth qualitative case study of an Indian mukbanger and male fitness content creator from Uttarakhand ("A"). A 75-min semi-structured interview was conducted via Zoom with an Indian mukbanger. The analysis generated three interconnected themes reflecting the creator's perceptions of audience engagement: (1) vicarious gratification and appetite regulation, (2) food preferences and non-vegetarian appeal, and (3) parasocial and gendered engagement dynamics. Findings suggest that, from the creator's perspective, mukbang functions as a digital site of vicarious eating, sensory stimulation, and parasocial interaction, through which viewers are perceived to regulate cravings, seek companionship, and engage with culturally embedded food practices. At the same time, the creator's account highlights tensions surrounding the normalization of excessive consumption and the "thinness paradox," wherein high-volume eating is performed alongside maintaining physical fitness. He also highlights how online hatred fuels platform engagement. While the study does not directly examine audience behavior, it provides insight into how creators interpret and construct their audiences within platform-driven ecosystems. These findings raise important ethical and public health considerations, particularly in relation to disordered eating patterns, digital influence, and the responsibilities of content creators and platforms.

Indexed as

algorithmic cultureautonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR)creator centricdigital commensalityeating behaviorsmukbangvicarious eating

Identifiers

PMID42488075
PMCPMC13390630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.