ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Eating on camera: a creator-centric case study of mukbang engagement in India.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mukbang, a global digital phenomenon in which individuals consume large quantities of food on camera, has gained increasing popularity across cultural contexts. Despite its growth in India, limited research has examined mukbang through the perspective of content creators. The present study addresses this gap through an in-depth qualitative case study of an Indian mukbanger and male fitness content creator from Uttarakhand ("A"). A 75-min semi-structured interview was conducted via Zoom with an Indian mukbanger. The analysis generated three interconnected themes reflecting the creator's perceptions of audience engagement: (1) vicarious gratification and appetite regulation, (2) food preferences and non-vegetarian appeal, and (3) parasocial and gendered engagement dynamics. Findings suggest that, from the creator's perspective, mukbang functions as a digital site of vicarious eating, sensory stimulation, and parasocial interaction, through which viewers are perceived to regulate cravings, seek companionship, and engage with culturally embedded food practices. At the same time, the creator's account highlights tensions surrounding the normalization of excessive consumption and the "thinness paradox," wherein high-volume eating is performed alongside maintaining physical fitness. He also highlights how online hatred fuels platform engagement. While the study does not directly examine audience behavior, it provides insight into how creators interpret and construct their audiences within platform-driven ecosystems. These findings raise important ethical and public health considerations, particularly in relation to disordered eating patterns, digital influence, and the responsibilities of content creators and platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.