ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Unveiling the impact of varied load intensities on para-biathletes' performance in rifle shooting.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigated the effect of varied load intensities on shooting performance after standing and seated gliding by simulated Paralympics in conditions. Sixteen well-trained Chinese biathletes (average age 20.52 ± 0.88 years) completed tests at different transition times (100% HRmax, maximum heart rate; 85% HRmax, and 70% HRmax) in the sitting and standing postures. Subjects are required to glide in a double-braced cane maneuver and then complete the shot in a prone shooting position after gliding. Physiological measurements (HR, blood lactate concentration, and rating of perceived exertion) and shooting performance (hit number, shooting time, range time) were collected. For standing sliding, the mean number of hits of 70% HRmax was significantly different compared to 100% HRmax and 85% HRmax. For seated sliding, the shooting performance results revealed in the 2nd transition round, 85% HRmax had significantly higher shot hits than 100% HRmax. The load intensity of 85% HRmax has the best effect on para-biathlon athletes. Under this intensity, athletes have the shortest shooting time, the largest number of total shooting hits, and the highest hit rate and transition efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.