ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From financial scarcity to risk and time preferences: the role of executive functions.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding how financial scarcity influences intertemporal decision-making is crucial for designing effective poverty-alleviation policies. However, the cognitive mechanisms underlying this relationship remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the correlational patterns through which financial scarcity relates to risk and time preferences, with a particular focus on the mediating role of executive functions, specifically planning and initiating, attention, and self-control and self-monitoring. Methods: Cross-sectional survey data were collected from 468 rural residents in two historically impoverished counties in Yunnan Province, China. Financial scarcity was assessed using the Psychological Inventory of Financial Scarcity (PIFS), while executive functions were measured with a culturally adapted form of the Amsterdam Executive Function Inventory. Risk and time preferences were assessed through a lottery choice experiment and a money-earlier-or-later allocation task, respectively. Structural equation modeling with bootstrapped mediation tests was employed for data analysis. Results: The results indicate that financial scarcity is significantly associated with lower scores across all three dimensions of executive functioning. Critically, planning and initiating ability emerged as a consistent indirect pathway, yet with a notable divergence across preference domains: higher financial scarcity was associated with lower planning capacity, which in turn was associated with lower risk aversion, whereas lower planning ability was associated with decreased future orientation. Discussion: These findings are consistent with a function-selective refinement of the bandwidth model of scarcity and reveal a counterintuitive pattern in risk-related decisions, suggesting that cognitive depletion may paradoxically reduce risk aversion rather than uniformly impairing prudent choice. The study highlights the importance of designing targeted cognitive-scaffolding interventions to support sound decision-making under conditions of financial constraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.