ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Comparative effects of Baduanjin and square dance on working memory, executive function performance, mood, and fatigue in older women: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This exploratory randomized controlled trial compared the effects of Baduanjin and square dance on working memory, executive function performance, mood, fatigue, and selected physiological outcomes in older women. Methods: In this 12-week randomized controlled trial, 90 older women were allocated to Baduanjin, square dance, or control groups (n = 30 each). The exercise groups completed supervised 60-min sessions three times weekly. Cognitive outcomes were assessed with the N-back, Stroop, Flanker, and Digit Span tasks. Backward Digit Span and Stroop incongruent accuracy were retrospectively designated as the primary cognitive outcomes on theoretical grounds, whereas the remaining cognitive, psychological, and physiological outcomes were treated as secondary or exploratory outcomes. Seventy-nine participants completed the intervention and were included in the per-protocol analysis. Time × group interactions were tested using mixed-design ANOVA, with Bonferroni-adjusted simple-effect comparisons for interaction-significant outcomes. Results: Significant time × group interactions were observed for Stroop incongruent accuracy ( Conclusion: In this exploratory trial, Baduanjin and square dance were associated with favorable changes in selected cognitive and affective outcomes rather than across the full outcome battery. The observed cognitive pattern was descriptively broader in the Baduanjin group, but direct superiority over square dance was not established. These preliminary findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation in larger, prospectively registered trials with prespecified primary outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.