Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Dogs and cats as sources of companionship and emotional support in vulnerable animal caregivers.

Mónica Boada, Thaïs Sánchez, Noe Terrassa, Antoni Bulbena, Jonathan Bowen, Jaume Fatjó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mónica BoadaAffinity Foundation Chair for Animals and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Thaïs SánchezFoundation for Advice and Action in the Defence of Animals (FAADA), Barcelona, Spain.
Noe TerrassaFoundation for Advice and Action in the Defence of Animals (FAADA), Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni BulbenaAffinity Foundation Chair for Animals and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jonathan Bowen *Affinity Foundation Chair for Animals and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume Fatjó *Affinity Foundation Chair for Animals and Health, Department of Psychiatry and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social support may be crucial for the health and wellbeing of populations facing adversity, such as homelessness, intimate partner violence, or economic vulnerability. However, vulnerable individuals are usually at a high risk of social exclusion, having restricted social networks and limited social support. Companion animals constitute a potential source of support, but their relative contribution compared to other sources remains underexplored. In this study, we adopted a multifaceted approach to social support to investigate the relative importance and supportive functions of human and animal sources within the social support networks of 100 vulnerable individuals who were users of an intervention program. Participants rated the degree to which they considered their closest companion animal (dog/cat) a family member and answered a questionnaire regarding their social support network, in which they nominated and ranked sources of support based on their relevance. Our findings demonstrate that dogs and cats were considered genuine family members and constituted an important source of support. They were frequently the sole providers of companionship and emotional comfort, as well as of opportunities for physical closeness and nurturance. However, our results also indicate that human relationships remain necessary to meet other aspects of social support, such as obtaining guidance (informational support), receiving material or behavioural assistance (instrumental support) and gaining social recognition or approval. In sum, companion animals are a significant part of the already fragile social networks of vulnerable individuals; hence, protecting this bond is fundamental.

Indexed as

companion animalsdog-human relationshiphuman-animal interactionsocial healthsocial supportvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID42488043
PMCPMC13388327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.