ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Dogs and cats as sources of companionship and emotional support in vulnerable animal caregivers.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social support may be crucial for the health and wellbeing of populations facing adversity, such as homelessness, intimate partner violence, or economic vulnerability. However, vulnerable individuals are usually at a high risk of social exclusion, having restricted social networks and limited social support. Companion animals constitute a potential source of support, but their relative contribution compared to other sources remains underexplored. In this study, we adopted a multifaceted approach to social support to investigate the relative importance and supportive functions of human and animal sources within the social support networks of 100 vulnerable individuals who were users of an intervention program. Participants rated the degree to which they considered their closest companion animal (dog/cat) a family member and answered a questionnaire regarding their social support network, in which they nominated and ranked sources of support based on their relevance. Our findings demonstrate that dogs and cats were considered genuine family members and constituted an important source of support. They were frequently the sole providers of companionship and emotional comfort, as well as of opportunities for physical closeness and nurturance. However, our results also indicate that human relationships remain necessary to meet other aspects of social support, such as obtaining guidance (informational support), receiving material or behavioural assistance (instrumental support) and gaining social recognition or approval. In sum, companion animals are a significant part of the already fragile social networks of vulnerable individuals; hence, protecting this bond is fundamental.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.