ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Social goals and coping with interpersonal stress in adolescence.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prior studies have found that three types of social goals-social learning, social performance-avoidance, and social performance-approach goals-predict stress coping among adolescents. However, prior findings are limited by the range of stress contexts and coping forms examined. Furthermore, questions remain regarding how social performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals differ in predicting coping. To address these gaps, this study examined whether the three social goals differentially predict engagement, disengagement, and mixed forms of coping in the context of friend-related stress-an important but unexplored stress context and set of coping forms. Method: Participants were 137 students (67 girls) recruited from a public middle school in Japan. Data were collected using a cross-sectional design. A path analysis was conducted to examine the hypothesized associations. Results: As hypothesized, social learning goals were associated with relationship-rebuilding and positive reappraisal coping, a form of engagement (adaptive) coping; social performance-avoidance goals were associated with relationship-withdrawal coping, a form of disengagement (maladaptive) coping; and social performance-approach goals were associated with relationship-changing coping, a mixed form of engagement and disengagement (adaptive and maladaptive) coping. Although not initially hypothesized, social performance-approach goals were also associated with relationship-rebuilding and positive reappraisal coping. Discussion and conclusion: These findings support the predictive utility of the trichotomous framework of social goal orientations across stress contexts and coping forms. Furthermore, our findings support the discriminative utility of this framework by highlighting the contrasting roles of the three goals in coping. Notably, whereas social performance-avoidance goals may serve maladaptive functions in coping, social performance-approach goals seem to serve both maladaptive and adaptive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.