Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42488034›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Acute Exposure to Traces of Chlorantraniliprole Does Not Alter Antipredator Behaviour in Wild Crickets.

Emily Gilford, Miranda Johnstone, Mark Pitt, Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz, Chris Bass, Tom Tregenza, Bram Kuijper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily GilfordCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-9570
Miranda JohnstoneCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7920-9919
Mark PittSchool of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-9851
Rolando Rodríguez-MuñozCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6067-845X
Chris BassCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-1492
Tom TregenzaCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4182-2222
Bram KuijperCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7263-2846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to sublethal concentrations and low, non-target pesticide residues is now a common scenario for insects sharing their habitat with human agriculture. Such exposures have the potential to disrupt behaviour. However, much of this evidence comes from laboratory studies under controlled conditions and is concentrated on a limited range of taxa and pesticide classes, particularly pollinators. We tested whether exposure to a low, residue-level concentration of chlorantraniliprole, a widely used insecticide known for its long environmental persistence, affected antipredator escape behaviours in wild field crickets (

Indexed as

anthropogenic stressorsanti‐predator behaviourinsect behaviourpesticide exposuresublethal effectswild populations

Identifiers

PMID42488034
PMCPMC13388500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.